TFW you realize the robot you trained is going to take your job

Facebook is an enormously successful company that uses software to convince its users to give it content that it can distribute to other users, who will engage with the content and hopefully click on an ad, or at least generate more content for Facebook.

Facebook has recently started employing humans to create some specialized content of its own — summaries of newspaper stories other humans have written. Turns out that working for Facebook in that role — or, actually, for an employment agency Facebook uses to hire people for that role — is not a fun job.

It also doesn’t seem like a long-term job, per Gizmodo’s excellent report. Many of the people Facebook’s contractor hired to do the work last year have already quit or been pushed out. And they think that one day all of those jobs will disappear:

That said, many former employees suspect that Facebook’s eventual goal is to replace its human curators with a robotic one. The former curators Gizmodo interviewed started to feel like they were training a machine, one that would eventually take their jobs. Managers began referring to a “more streamlined process” in meetings. As one former contractor put it: “We felt like we were part of an experiment that, as the algorithm got better, there was a sense that at some point the humans would be replaced.”

Here’s the thing: It would be surprising if Facebook didn’t replace its humans — humans who need things like air, food and rest to do their work — with software that could efficiently summarize news stories. Why shouldn’t it?

Especially when other companies that are nowhere near Facebook’s size have already figured out how to make software that can write entire news stories. Like these earnings stories from Forbes, created by Narrative Science’s robots. Or earnings stories like this one, from the Associated Press, created by robots from Automated Insights.

Those stories are not very exciting! But they do an adequate job of pulling out the requisite information.

So does this headline: “Talladega Superspeedway: 2 Bodies Found at Track Prior to NASCAR Race on Sunday, Reports Says.” Let’s assume that in the future, Facebook won’t need a human to write that one.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via