Skip to main content

Believe that journalism can make a difference

If you believe in the work we do at Vox, please support us by becoming a member. Our mission has never been more urgent. But our work isn’t easy. It requires resources, dedication, and independence. And that’s where you come in.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

Hillary Clinton's campaign just released the worst Venn diagram of all time

Hillary Clinton side-eye.
Hillary Clinton side-eye.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign just committed what can only be described as a data catastrophe.

The campaign, in promoting its gun policy agenda, sent out this tweet:

The general point is true: The great majority of Americans do support universal background checks, including the great majority of gun owners.

But this is simply not how Venn diagrams work. The circles are completely wrong. They should, for one, overlap entirely, since the gun owners referenced in this are all Americans. And the circle for Americans should be much, much bigger than the circle for gun owners, since gun owners make up just one segment of the US population. (That is, unless, the Clinton campaign is literally saying that a lot of gun owners are un-American, which is a very, very hot take for a risk-averse campaign.)

With that said, here’s a rough approximation of what this diagram should look like if the campaign insists on using circles:

A reader made another version, which is slightly more complicated but makes the same point better (green is gun owners, purple is Americans who support universal background checks, and red is Americans who don’t support universal background checks):

As you can see, these aren’t even Venn diagrams anymore; they’re Euler diagrams. That’s because a Venn diagram was the wrong choice for this data point in the first place. Maybe what Clinton wanted was a pie chart, bar chart, or Euler diagram, or maybe she didn’t even need a chart — an infographic with the numbers splashed in big letters could have worked.

Instead, we got an atrocity in data visualization.

In the grand scheme of things, this isn’t the worst thing Clinton has done. (After all, she voted for the war in Iraq.) But this is pretty bad.


Watch: Why the y-axis doesn’t always need to start at zero

More in Politics

The horrifying implications of today’s Supreme Court argument on trans rightsThe horrifying implications of today’s Supreme Court argument on trans rights
Supreme Court

The Court appears likely to uphold bans on gender-affirming care, and may gut the rules barring all forms of sex discrimination in the process.

By Ian Millhiser
The South Korean president’s stunning martial law decree, explainedThe South Korean president’s stunning martial law decree, explained
World Politics

The National Assembly voted down the decree, but the political crisis isn’t over.

By Ellen Ioanes
I listened to hours of Trump’s FBI pick on Steve Bannon’s podcast. Oh boy.I listened to hours of Trump’s FBI pick on Steve Bannon’s podcast. Oh boy.
Politics

Kash Patel believes a lot of wild — and disturbing — stuff.

By Zack Beauchamp
Why protests in the country of Georgia matterWhy protests in the country of Georgia matter
World Politics

Georgians are trying to move toward Europe. Their government may have different plans.

By Ellen Ioanes
Weed is now America’s daily drug of choice. No one’s sure what that means.Weed is now America’s daily drug of choice. No one’s sure what that means.
The Highlight

Land of the free, home of the blazed.

By Marin Cogan
6 questions about Hunter Biden’s sweeping pardon, answered6 questions about Hunter Biden’s sweeping pardon, answered
Criminal Justice

Have presidents pardoned their family before? How could Biden still use his pardon powers?

By Nicole Narea