Digiday branches out from media to fashion with Glossy, a new business site

Pop quiz: What do digital publishing and the business of fashion have to do with each other?

Trick question: Not that much!

That’s why the people behind Digiday, the very smart publication that makes money covering ad blocking and declining CPMs, is launching Glossy, a new publication that covers Ralph Lauren’s internet-connected fitting rooms and Sephora’s face-scanning, makeup-recommending gizmo.

The premise of Glossy is that the fashion and luxury industries are just starting to adapt to technology, just as the media business has been doing for the past decade (or more). The publication is aimed at people who need to figure that out, like executives at fashion brands, ad agencies and high-end retail, says Digiday Media CEO Nick Friese.

“The people on the inside who believe that transformation is afoot — those are the people we want to reach,” he said.

While lots of publishers cater to people who like looking at things that come out of the fashion and luxury industries, the pool of people covering the business end of it isn’t that deep. Penske Media has a stable of publications that do it, most notably Women’s Wear Daily. So does Business of Fashion.

Glossy will take on a different subject than Digiday, but it will share plenty of DNA. The new property will be run by Digiday managing editor Shareen Pathak and Digiday reporter Hilary Milnes. And it will also have the same business model: An ad-supported site aimed at an influential but small-scale audience (Digiday’s site attracts a million visitors a month) augmented with other revenue streams like conferences and, perhaps, a paid offering.

That model seems to be working out. The company, formed in 2008, is now profitable on more than “eight figures” in annual revenue, Friese says.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via