It's 2016, so Twitter will make it easier to cram photos and links into tweets

The Twitter biggification is coming.

Jack Dorsey and company are going to make it easier for users to stick more stuff in their tweets.

Not by dropping the service's famous 140 character limit — an idea the company had previously floated — but by expanding it, in a way: Twitter won't count the characters used to insert photos, links or other media into tweets against the 140 character limit.

Bloomberg says the change "could happen in the next two weeks," citing a person who would know. I talked to one of those people, and they didn't argue with the report.

Now imagine I wrote some boilerplate text about Twitter needing to make changes to its product to make it easier to use, so that its growth rate will stop flagging. Good? Okay.

But the fact that this story is a story, in 2016, tells you how reluctant Twitter has been, over the course of many years and many executives, to make even slight changes to its product.

There's absolutely no reason for the company to keep the 140-character limit anymore — it's an artifact of Twitter's birth as an SMS service, in an era when smartphones were still rare. And even if Twitter does like the idea of the forced concision that the limit requires, it could have instituted this change a long time ago.

Now: Cue tweets from Twitter users who think the change will hurt the platform.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via