Oh snap! Hillary Clinton hits Donald Trump with a string of 'face swaps.'

Hillary Clinton put a new face — actually, several — on the political attack ad in a Snapchat campaign targeting Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump.

The Democratic presidential candidate used Snapchat’s new “face swap” feature to superimpose the images of prominent past Republican presidents on Trump’s visage to lampoon the billionaire real estate mogul’s claims that he would begin acting “presidential.”

One of the ads puts Abraham Lincoln’s angular face on Trump while calling out the candidate for refusing to disavow the endorsement of white-supremacist David Duke, former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Another puts the image of Dwight D. Eisenhower, a World War II hero, on Trump as it notes his disparagement of Arizona senator and former POW John McCain.

The series employs other notables — Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush — while referencing Trump’s calls for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S., his mocking of a New York Times reporter with a disability and his statement about punishing women who have abortions (should the procedure be declared illegal).

The effect is … disturbing, leaving the viewer with the impression of Trump as, well, Frankencandidate.

Snapchat, with more than 100 million active daily users, has emerged as the 2016 election campaign’s platform of choice for novel political ads. Candidates look to the popular app as a way to reach voters under the age of 34, nearly half of whom are on Snapchat on any given day.

A Super PAC supporting Florida Sen. Marco Rubio used Snapchat’s geofilters in Virginia to tag Trump as a “con artist” and emphasize his failed Trump University, which is the subject of a fraud suit. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz sponsored a Snapchat filter to label Trump as “Ducking Donald” when his opponent refused to participate in a Republican presidential candidates debate.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via