How a too-clever attempt to oppose women in combat turned into a bill opening the draft to women

A Republican congress member from California tried to make a point about women in the military, and it backfired.

Amid the debate about the Pentagon announcing it would allow qualified women in combat roles, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) proposed to amend a defense bill to also require 18- to 26-year-old women to register for Selective Service, more commonly known as the draft.

"Right now draft is sexist," Hunter said, proposing the amendment to the defense authorization bill to point out that if people didn't want women to be drafted, they shouldn't be in combat roles. Hunter himself both opposes allowing women in combat, and does not think it is a good idea to require women to register for the draft.

But to his surprise, members of the legislature from both sides of the aisle said women should be required to register for the draft.

"I actually think if we want equality in this country, if we want women to be treated precisely like men are treated and that they should not be discriminated against, we should be willing to support a universal conscription," Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) said.

The committee voted to include Hunter's amendment, 32 to 30.

The law that requires only men to register for the draft was upheld in the Supreme Court in 1981, largely because at the time the Department of Defense did not allow women in combat. Now that that has changed, Rep. Chris Gibson (R-NY) joined the Democrats to argue for universally "standards-based" draft — making the language surrounding Selective Service consistent with changes in combat policies.

Last December, the Department of Defense announced the military would open all combat roles to women. However, the historic policy change did not address whether or not the United States military would require women to register for the draft — something that is up to members of Congress.

Hunter never intended for the amendment to pass the committee; while introducing it, he described the graphic nature of front lines, to which, he said, women should not be exposed.

Hunter voted against his own amendment.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via