The only time Harriet Tubman was in a major feature film, there were vampires in it too

Harriet Tubman lived the kind of life Hollywood biopics dream of. It was filled with huge dramatic stakes, big moments, and plenty of emotional opportunities for an actress who wants to win an Oscar. And now that Tubman's going to be on the $20 bill, it would seem even more like this is the right time for a movie about her.

Devin Faraci, editor in chief of the movie site Birth. Movies. Death., identified three periods in Tubman's life that would make natural movies — with strong dramatic arcs and everything.

Harriet Tubman movie 1: Early life/escape from slavery
Movie 2: Underground Railroad
Movie 3: Union Spy

— devin faraci (@devincf) April 20, 2016

In response to Faraci, author Seth Grahame-Smith said that Tubman has only been depicted onscreen in a feature film once.

@devincf Sad: Only one theatrical motion picture has portrayed Harriet Tubman to date. Sadder: It was Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.

— Seth Grahame-Smith (@sethgs) April 20, 2016

Presumably, Grahame-Smith would know, because his novel formed the basis of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. And when I checked his tweet, I could only find major fictional depictions of Tubman in a TV miniseries and a short film. She's also had tiny parts in a handful of independent films that barely saw release. (You can see every time someone has played Harriet Tubman onscreen here.)

Now, that's not to discount either. A TV miniseries is a big deal! But neither has the prestige of a big, Oscar-baiting feature film (or even a less awards-friendly, more action-focused take on Tubman's days as a Union spy in the Civil War).

Not every historical figure has a great film — but Hollywood at least usually tries with white men

There are long lists of American historical figures who simply haven't had a great movie made about them.

Alexander Hamilton, for instance, has only been the protagonist of a little-known 1931 movie (based on a Broadway play), though one presumes he will soon be the subject of a much better-known movie (also presumably based on a Broadway show).

Even just looking at presidents, it's hard to think of a truly impressive film about everybody from George Washington to Teddy Roosevelt. (Arguably the only president with multiple great films is Abraham Lincoln — though Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is not among them.)

Yet if you look at the fictional histories of these men, it's evident that Hollywood has at least tried. Andrew Jackson, for instance, the man Tubman is replacing on the $20, has appeared in numerous films, including something called The Gorgeous Hussy.

Tubman's failure to even appear as a supporting player in others' films is another reminder that a story — true or not — can have all the advantages for a big-screen adaptation, but it still takes massive will to push it through a Hollywood studio system that continues to be skeptical about telling stories about anybody other than straight white men (and comic-book superheroes).

Hope may be on the way, however.

Oscar nominee and Emmy winner Viola Davis is developing a film about Tubman's life. (Currently, the project is set for TV's HBO, not a major studio, but things can change.) Development is a long, arduous process, with many possible places where everything can fall apart, but this proposed project just got a nice infusion of free publicity.

Here's hoping it makes this movie a reality.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via