Apple's Craig Federighi Says Rolling Back to Old Mobile OS Would Be Nuts

Apple’s software chief, Craig Federighi, says that law enforcement’s suggestion that the company roll back to an older version of its mobile operating system would make everyone less secure.

Federighi used an op-ed in the Washington Post to pick apart Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s proposal that Apple return to iOS 7 — the 2013 version of the operating system that allowed law enforcement to extract data from the smartphones.

While secure for its time, iOS 7 has subsequently been breached by hackers, including those who’ve sold their techniques to others with malicious intent, Federighi writes.

“That’s why it’s so disappointing that the FBI, Justice Department and others in law enforcement are pressing us to turn back the clock to a less-secure time and less-secure technologies,” Federighi writes on the Washington Post op-ed page. “They have suggested that the safeguards of iOS 7 were good enough and that we should simply go back to the security standards of 2013.”

Apple and the government are locked in a battle over device encryption. Government prosecutors want the technology company to create a version of its software that would disable security protections on an iPhone used by one of the shooters in the San Bernardino attacks.

Federighi says Apple’s software team tries to stay a step ahead of the criminals who want to pry personal information from our devices. The number of high-profile breaches of retail chains, banks and the federal government over the last 18 months reveal the seriousness of the threat.

“But the threat to our personal information is just the tip of the iceberg,” Federighi writes. “Your phone is more than a personal device. In today’s mobile, networked world, it’s part of the security perimeter that protects your family and co-workers.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via