Apple's Tim Cook Uses Product Launch Stage to Preview FBI Court Fight

Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook used the high-profile platform of the company’s latest product launch to make the case against the government in the ongoing and increasingly acrimonious battle over encryption.

Cook sought to explore the broader implications of the dispute, which he has argued is unprecedented and would leave consumers vulnerable to hackers and other cyber criminals. He called the iPhone the most “deeply personal” of devices — and one that is an extension of ourselves.

“About a month ago, we asked Americans across the country to join in a conversation. We need to decide as a nation how much power the government should have over our data and over our privacy,” Cook said in remarks. “I’ve been humbled and deeply grateful for the outpouring of support we’ve received from Americans across the country and from all walks of life.”

Cook reiterated earlier statements that Apple did not expect to be “at odds with our own government.”

“But we believe strongly that we have a responsibility to help you protect your data and protect your privacy,” Cook said. “We owe it to our customers and we owe it to our country. This is an issue that impacts all of us, and we will not shrink from this responsibility.”

Cook’s remarks preview the legal battle that plays out Tuesday in a federal court in Riverside, Calif., where lawyers for the Justice Department and Apple will argue over an arcane federal statute known as the All Writs Act. At issue in the court case is whether it can be used to force Apple to help federal investigators hack into a phone used by one of the shooters in the San Bernardino attack.

The Apple executive has been waging a publicity campaign for weeks, seeking to influence public opinion in the emotionally charged case. In a letter to consumers and in an interview with ABC World News, he has argued that the government is trying to get Apple to create a master key that would unlock hundreds of millions of devices.

“It is, in our view, the software equivalent of cancer,” Cook said in the interview with ABC’s David Muir. “Is this something that should be created? Technology can do so many things. But there are many things [it] should never be allowed to do.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via