John Oliver clearly explains the complicated fight between Apple and the FBI

For the past few weeks, Apple has been locked in a tense battle with the FBI over a dead terrorist suspect's phone.

The fight is fairly complicated. It involves encryption, advances in modern technology, and long-running disputes about the right balance between privacy and security.

On Sunday, Last Week Tonight host John Oliver took a deep dive into the issue.

The fight began when Apple refused to help unlock deceased San Bernardino terrorist suspect Syed Rizwan Farook's iPhone, citing concerns that providing the encryption key to the device could give the FBI a "master key" that could work on other people's iPhones as well. The FBI has argued that Apple is being overly cautious and that the technology company could find a way to unlock just Farook's phone.

At the heart of all of this is encryption, the code that helps keep our phones safe from intruders, but has also made life harder for law enforcement.

For Apple, the big concern is that weakening the encryption on its phones would weaken people's protections and security not just against government intrusions, but even private individuals who could manage to steal or duplicate whatever key Apple makes for the FBI.

For the FBI, the primary worry is getting into Farook's phone. It believes that Apple is exaggerating the risks. And it's citing a 227-year-old law, the All Writs Act of 1789, to try to force Apple to cooperate.

It's a very messy issue — one that could end up in the Supreme Court. Oliver does a good job combing through the details, so make sure to watch above.

For more, check out Tim Lee's explainer on Vox.

Watch: The FBI and Apple's fight, explained

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via