Twitter Aims to Name Two New Board Members This Week. (We'll See!)

According to multiple sources, Twitter is aiming to name two new board members to replace a pair of outgoing ones at the same time it announces its fourth-quarter earnings tomorrow.

But other sources cautioned that might not happen on time, even though one man and one woman have been undergoing serious due diligence.

If the vetting can be completed, they are most likely to take the place of current directors Peter Chernin and Peter Currie. Other board changes are likely in the future, said sources, but this is not the complete turnover of the board that has been reported could happen.

So who are the mystery candidates? According to sources, one candidate getting strong scrutiny has been a top exec at a major media company, while the other is a powerful creative player within Hollywood. One name that fits that bill and continues to be mentioned by insiders at Twitter is mega-producer Shonda Rhimes, creator of television hits like “Grey’s Anatomy,” “Scandal” and “How to Get Away With Murder.” I pinged execs at her network, ABC, but got no response.

A Twitter spokesman also declined comment.

But a name like Rhimes is not such a reach — unlike a lot of the board, she is an active Twitter user and also a canny business exec, as well as a media powerhouse.

In addition, even grander names have been suggested for the company’s board, including Oprah (who’s a NOprah, I am told) and rapper Kendrick Lamar (Twitter CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey is a super-fan).

One thing has been clear in the director search: Dorsey has been trying to diversify and reinvigorate the Twitter board, hoping that fresh thinking will give the company a much-needed shot of energy. Indeed, the board has largely been homogenous over the years — which is to say pretty much a group of white men (and only one woman).

Meanwhile, Wall Street has been piling on, sending the stock to new lows, and there are rumblings that activists could attack soon.

Twitter is indeed in a dicey situation, especially if its report tomorrow is weak and guidance is shaky. Why? Well, for one, the company’s valuation is now under $10 billion, with its stock down 63 percent since its IPO in late 2013. Twitter most definitely needs to show strong revenue growth, but more importantly an improvement in active monthly users.

It does not help that Facebook turned in a monster quarter, looking like a stable juggernaut, even as Twitter has had an exodus of execs and many questions around where its product is going.

If this were a Shonda Rhimes show, we’d call it a cliffhanger.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via