Twitter Says It Took Down 125,000 ISIS-Related Accounts Since Last Year

Twitter says it is doing its part to combat terrorism online. The company announced today that it has “suspended over 125,000 accounts for threatening or promoting terrorist acts primarily related to ISIS” since the middle of last year.

That’s a lot of accounts, and it’s possible some of them were created by the same people who get booted then come right back to create another one. This is one of the challenges for Twitter, which offers its users anonymity (unlike, say, Facebook).

A study released in the fall by George Washington University found that Twitter was indeed the platform of choice for ISIS propagandists in part because creating accounts is so simple.

Twitter does not actively look for terrorist accounts, but instead relies on users to report them. When this happens, though, the company will look at “similar” accounts to see if they violate the company’s terms of service, which prohibit things like violent threats.

Twitter says it has also “increased the size of the teams that review reports, reducing [its] response time significantly” on reported accounts.

This is all good news for government officials, who have been vocal in requesting that social networks like Facebook and Twitter take a more active role in weeding out the bad guys. Both companies claim to do everything in their power to remove these accounts and this material, but they don’t go actively hunting it.

This makes it a challenging job, Twitter wrote in its blog.

“As many experts and other companies have noted, there is no ‘magic algorithm’ for identifying terrorist content on the Internet,” the post reads, “so global online platforms are forced to make challenging judgement calls based on very limited information and guidance.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via