Facebook is finally acknowledging that not everything is "likeable"

For all the people who wished Facebook had a "dislike" button, your wish just came true.

The social media giant finally released its new "reactions" feature, which will allow users to comment in emoji.

Facebook added "Haha," "Wow," "Sad," "Love," and, most importantly, "Angry" emoticon buttons as an extension of the company's iconic "Like" function. All you have to do is hold down the "Like" button, and voilà, Facebook will allow you to react to your friends' political news feed rants with a range of emoticons.

Facebook

Last September, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg publicly announced the company’s push to expand emoji past the "like" option.

"Not every moment is a good moment, right? And if you are sharing something that’s sad, like whether it's something in current events like the refugee crisis that touches you, or a family member passed away, then it may not be comfortable to 'like' that post," Zuckerberg said in a public Q&A.

Facebook chose the specific "reactions" after months of market and focus group testing. According to its blog post, Facebook used the most commonly commented words and stickers to decide which emoji would fare best. Users in Spain and Ireland have been using the emoticons since last year as part of the company's research.

Unlike most changes to Facebook's user interface, users have taken well to the addition of emoji reactions – possibly because they are familiar with the concept from other social media and communication tools.

As Vox explained last October, Facebook is playing a little bit of catch-up with this new feature. Tools like the messaging platform Slack also allow users to react to messages with a range of emoji. The now-defunct social media app Peach, which trended for a week in January, had the same feature, but with a different selection of emoji.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via