Famous novels, broken down by punctuation

When most people read novels, they probably aren't thinking much about how many commas or quotation marks each sentence contains. Generally, punctuation exists to make the process of reading easier, to smooth the flow from sentence to paragraph to page. When done well, punctuation almost disappears into the background, leaving the reader (copy editors aside) to focus on the words.

But as Princeton scientist Adam Calhoun recently found, the punctuation that writers use — and the frequency with which they use it — can reveal as much about their writing style as their word choice.

Calhoun decided to strip the words from his favorite texts to look at the punctuation alone, and noticed a few significant differences among great works of literature. Here, for instance, is a passage from Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian (on the left), compared with one from William Faulkner's Absalom, Absalom!

As is obvious even from the two books' titles, Faulkner is much more generous and varied with his punctuation; his writing is stuffed with parentheses, quotation marks, and even semicolons, while McCarthy's largely sticks to placid periods, commas, and question marks.

Calhoun also surveyed the frequency of various punctuation marks in several different books. He found, fittingly for Ernest Hemingway's famously straightforward, declarative style, that A Farewell to Arms is short on the exclamation points and generous with the periods. And the oft-misused semicolon seems to get less popular over time; compare Pride and Prejudice (originally published in 1813) with Blood Meridian (1985).

Adam Calhoun

If you prefer your punctuation visualizations a bit more colorful, Calhoun also turned his findings into "heat maps" by representing periods, question marks, and exclamation marks in red, commas and quotation marks in green, and semicolons and colons in blue.

(Adam Calhoun)

It's a fascinating way of thinking about literature and how rich and varied the English language is — right down to the humble comma. Check out Calhoun's Medium post to see more cool visualizations of how writers use punctuation.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via