New York Times: we didn’t damage Donald Trump’s reputation. It was garbage anyway.

When the New York Times published its blockbuster story chronicling two women’s on-the-record accounts of being sexually assaulted by Donald Trump, they basically guaranteed the Trump campaign, and Trump himself, would go to war. Trump's campaign lawyer sent a letter to Times executive editor Dean Baquet that very night threatening a lawsuit if the paper did not retract the story, accusing the paper of being "willing to provide a platform to anyone wishing to smear Mr. Trump’s name and reputation.”

The Times’ own general counsel David E. McCraw has now responded, saying, in effect, that Trump's reputation was already too horrible for anything the paper writes to possibly worsen it.

"The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one's reputation,” he writes. “Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women … Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself."

You can read the full letter here. McCraw’s letter is remarkable, in that it picks up on one of the most striking things about this scandal: Trump is lashing out at women and the press, and calling them liars, for accusing him of doing things he was caught on tape bragging about doing. His reputation, through his decades of public misogyny, is of someone who targets women, who harasses them, and who treats them unfailingly as sex objects, even when they’re children or his own daughter.

The Times’ report did not damage that reputation. It confirmed it.

Watch: Women accusing Trump of sexual assault

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via