HBO Isn't Netflix. Which Is Why It Should Stay With Time Warner.

Three years ago, Netflix said it wanted to become HBO.

Now there’s pressure for HBO to become Netflix, by spinning out from parent company Time Warner.

The idea, according to some investors and other folks who have been murmuring about the theory for a while, is that pulling HBO out of Time Warner will make it much more valuable. Because Wall Street thinks HBO is like Netflix, and Wall Street thinks Netflix is worth a lot of money.

I asked Netflix CEO Reed Hastings about an HBO spinoff this week and he said it was a dumb idea. In a report today, Barclays analyst Kannan Venkateshwar says the same thing. I agree with them.

Here’s the short version of the “don’t spin HBO” argument: While HBO sort of looks like Netflix — HBO has about 95 million subscribers and probably generated $5.6 billion in revenue last year; Netflix has 70 million subs and probably did $6.8 billion — Wall Street loves Netflix because Netflix is growing very, very fast. And HBO isn’t:

And spinning out HBO won’t help HBO grow any faster. Even though Time Warner is starting to offer HBO as a standalone product sold over the Web, almost all of its business is tethered to traditional pay TV providers, who retail the service to their customers. HBO’s best bet for growth is getting better deals with those companies (which, kind of paradoxically, is one of the reasons it is selling HBO over the Web in the first place).

Meanwhile, even if Wall Street does reward HBO for breaking free of Time Warner, it may punish Time Warner for losing HBO. An HBO-less Time Warner would be dominated by its Turner networks, a group of cable channels that are not setting the world on fire, and would have even less leverage with cable distributors without HBO to back it up. Or, in Venkateshwar’s words: “A spinoff could offer some dis-synergies for [Time Warner].”

So here’s an alternative theory: Since Time Warner has gotten very good at selling off stuff it doesn’t like (AOL, Warner Music Group, Time Warner Cable and most recently Time Inc.), why not keep going and parcel off Turner? That one may not work as a spinoff, but there are certainly lots of buyers for widely distributed cable channels, even if they’re not crushing it.

Then, who knows? Maybe before Jeff Bewkes retires — he just re-upped his contract to stay through 2020 — he ends up spinning off Warner Bros., too. Which would leave him owning a single company: HBO. There! Same result, different timeline.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

We're here to shed some clarity

One of our core beliefs here at Vox is that everyone needs and deserves access to the information that helps them understand the world, regardless of whether they can pay for a subscription. With the 2024 election on the horizon, more people are turning to us for clear and balanced explanations of the issues and policies at stake. We’re so grateful that we’re on track to hit 85,000 contributions to the Vox Contributions program before the end of the year, which in turn helps us keep this work free. We need to add 2,500 contributions this month to hit that goal. Will you make a contribution today to help us hit this goal and support our policy coverage? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via