The case for: The thinking is simple: Gangs have realized that shootings are bad for them. Knowing that police are much more likely to come down on their neighborhoods or organizations if they take part in a shooting, gang members have tried to avoid violence.
”The violence is simply bad for business,” George Tita of the University of California Irvine says. “If one of their friends is part of a shooting, it’s going to make it tougher for them to put money in their pocket.”
The case against: There isn’t good research on whether gangs are getting less violent overall and how much of an impact that’s having on crime. Tita acknowledges this: “No studies have been carefully constructed to give me 100 percent confidence or even 90 percent confidence that any one of these things I’m telling you is true.”
The bottom line: Still unclear. Intuitively, the idea makes sense. But without adequate research, it’s hard to know just how accurate it is.
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:
First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.
Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.
So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)
If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.
-
The theory: putting more people in prison helped reduce crime
-
The theory: putting more police on the streets prevented crime
-
The theory: broken-windows policing prevented serious crime
-
The theory: police have gotten better at detecting and preventing crime
-
The theory: more guns, less crime
-
The theory: the economy got better and crime got less appealing
-
The theory: crime is harder because people don’t carry cash as much anymore
-
The theory: people aren’t committing crimes because they’re inside playing video games
-
The theory: gentrification is taking over crime-ridden neighborhoods
-
The theory: people are committing fewer crimes because they’re drinking less alcohol
-
The theory: psychiatric pills reduced violent and criminal behavior
-
The theory: less crack use led to less crime
-
The theory: the US population is just aging out of crime
-
The theory: legal abortion is preventing would-be criminals from being born
-
The theory: lead exposure caused crime, and lead abatement efforts reduced it
Sign up for the newsletter Sentences
The day's most important news stories, explained in your inbox.