This interactive website shows how wrong Mercator projections can be

Do you realize how tiny Greenland really is? The most common type of map hugely distorts its true size, as this GIF by Tom Phillips shows. It starts showing how Greenland looks on a Mercator projection, but then Phillips drags the shape down to reveal Greenland's true size.

Lovely bit of work on how map projections are weird. Greenland is just taking the piss. http://t.co/lhuta1RRvI pic.twitter.com/eqbDi7v9DP

— Tom Phillips (@flashboy) September 8, 2015

That GIF comes from a new interactive map project, the True Size. It lets you visualize how big countries really are, rather than how big they appear when distorted on a map. Created by James Talmage and Damon Maneice, the site uses Google Maps to show the actual size of different countries and landmasses. You can drag countries around the map, and they'll dynamically shift to show how big they are relative to each other. Sometimes that reveals massive distortions, like with Greenland.

For example, look how the United States, China, and India would all almost fit onto Africa:

True Size

Mercator Projections, the type of map Google and many other services use, were made for navigating the ocean, not visualizing the size of landmasses. So while it's great for neatly laying out routes on perfectly straight latitude and longitude lines, its distortions make things closer to the poles appear much larger and shift countries to the wrong regions on the map.

The Mercator projection has become increasingly controversial, and the debate even includes a West Wing episode, which inspired Talmage and Maneice. It eloquently states the argument that the Mercator projection shortchanges areas like Africa, and by making Africa look smaller, the continent occupies a smaller global mindshare than it should (though note that Mercator was Flemish, not German, as the bantering cartographer says):

The alternative suggested in the video is the Gall-Peters projection, which tries to correct for the Mercator projection's inaccuracies.

As compelling as Aaron Sorkin's West Wing dialogue may be, the True Size website may be even more impressive. Words can explain a lot about the shortcomings of the Mercator projection. But a picture of Alaska, shrunk to reality, might be worth even more:

True Size

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via