This 1853 image might show the first photobomb

This picture, circa 1853, may be the first photobomb. Just look at that person in the upper left-hand corner, ruining a perfectly good shot:

Mary Dillwyn/National Library of Wales

As improbable as it sounds, there's a chance it really was the first photobomb (though the term "photobomb" itself, defined as the prank of popping up in someone else's photo, is firmly part of the 21st century).

The photograph's creator, Mary Dillwyn, was one of the earliest Welsh photographers in the 1840s and 1850s, and there aren't many other preserved photos that old. In addition, her informal photos were relatively unique for the time — using a smaller camera with a relatively short exposure time, she was able to capture fleeting expressions while other cameras could take more than a minute. So it's entirely possible that someone could slide into her picture as a practical joke, the same way we do today. At the very least, someone was sneaking into the frame.

The picture is a highlight of more than 4,500 images the National Library of Wales recently released into Wikimedia Commons. And you can browse a gallery of Dillwyn's photos here, including other charmingly natural photos, as well as what's probably the first snowman ever to appear on camera. But the photobomb may be the highlight: It's proof that people always loved ruining photos — even before most people knew what "photos" were.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via