The Financial Times Sale to Nikkei Means Bloomberg Can Finally Focus on Buying the New York Times

The Financial Times, the must-read business broadsheet for the 1 percent for over a century, is being sold to Japanese financial news publisher Nikkei for about $1.3 billion. That’s after earlier reports (including in the FT itself), that the newspaper could be sold to German publisher Axel Springer.

The FT’s stellar reputation has long made it a potential trophy asset among billionaires and has been eyed by powerful people for awhile, most notably by Mike Bloomberg, who has a hefty news operation of his own. Still, he wanted the FT, and I’d heard that he was mulling it very recently when it came up for sale (again).

Now, the list of potential acquisitions that could help Bloomberg wield wider influence has narrowed considerably to just one: The New York Times.

Previous editors of the Times, particularly Jill Abramson, had made it clear they didn’t think Bloomberg would be a good owner. More importantly, it’s less clear what members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family, who control the paper, think about the former New York City mayor. Bloomberg has attended a number of family events in the past, typically closed to outsiders, if that tells you anything.

Bloomberg has told confidants he’d still like to make a run for the Times, but despite Bloomberg’s billions, it won’t be easy. If the family were to sell it wouldn’t only be about money (though that’s still very important.) They see it as a matter of stewardship — in other words, someone who won’t think of themselves as bigger than the institution itself.

But if anyone can, Bloomberg would be a pretty good bet. And given some of the Times’ struggles of late, the family may have to decide sooner rather than later.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via