Hillary Clinton: Take away executives' bonuses when their companies break the rules

Hillary Clinton wants executives to forfeit bonus money when their companies are fined for misconduct.

The frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination unveiled the proposal in a Facebook Q&A session Monday.

"Too often it seems like the people responsible get off with limited consequences (or none at all). Even when they’ve already pocketed the gains," Clinton said. "That's wrong and it has to change."

She laid out a three-part plan to do that.

1) Appoint and empower tough, independent-minded regulators and give them the resources they need to do their jobs.

2) Make sure that good people have real incentives to come forward and report illegal activity by raising the whistleblower caps so they're actually effective.

3) Make sure that when corporations pay fines to the government for wrongdoing, those fines cut into the bonuses of the executives who should have been accountable or should have caught the problem.

The proposals are part of Clinton's larger economic platform, which she has been constructing in piecemeal fashion in recent days. The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that she wants to raise certain capital gains taxes in part to encourage long-term investment over short-term profits.

Under current law, whistleblower awards are capped at $1.6 million. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, who settled a slew of cases against banks, suggested increasing awards late last year.

Clinton did not get into the specific mechanisms she would use to empower regulators, boost compensation for whistleblowers, and penalize executives for corporate misbehavior. Congress would have to act in all three areas, as the Senate confirms regulators and both chambers write laws governing the finance industry.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via