This visualization shows why time seems to pass faster as you get older

Is how fast time goes by a function of how old you are?

This interactive visualization by designer Maximilian Kiener makes that argument. It shows that the longer you live, the relative significance of any particular year of your life goes down.

So, for instance, for a 2-year-old, a single year is a full half of their young life. Every moment is a bigger part of the whole.

Maximillan Kiener

By 30, that's changed a lot. For an average 30-year-old, a single year is just 3.33 percent of their life.

Maximillan Kiener

By the time you're 60, the years have shrunk even more, to just 1.67 percent of your life.

Maximillan Kiener

So is there any reason to believe the scroll wheel is an apt metaphor for how we live?

Kiener says his idea for the visualization came courtesy of philosopher Paul Janet (1823–1899), who was cited in an 1886 article by William James in the Journal of Speculative Philosophy. In that article, Janet is quoted as writing:

Whoever counts many lustra in his memory need only question himself to find that the last of these, the past five years, have sped much more quickly than the preceding periods of equal amount. Let any one remember his last eight or ten school years: it is the space of a century. Compare with them the last eight or ten years of life: it is the space of an hour.

A formula similar to the one in the visualization follows.

So is the diminishing significance of each year the reason those summers in our 30s pass so much more quickly than the ones when we were 8? That's too hard to conclude — in the same article, James proposes that it's the monotony of routine, not the buildup of time, that makes time pass more quickly as we age. In other words, we've seen it all before. There's less novelty to distinguish one moment from the next.

Whatever the reason, the visualization shows one less arguable truth: Time often turns out to be simple math. And all those hours add up.

Thanks to Maria Popova's Explore for noting this slightly depressing visualization.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via