This old Pepsi ad boasted about having more calories than a lamb chop

Today, sugary sodas are seen as bad for you. But it wasn't always that way.

In 1942, Pepsi bragged about how many calories it had in this fantastic ad, published in the New York Times and elsewhere:

Vintage Pepsi Ad

Check out the food energy comparisons in which Pepsi boasts it contains more calories than a lamb chop and urges consumers to choose the drink over a measly egg or tomato:

Vintage Pepsi Ad

That's because at the time, Pepsi wasn't just Pepsi. It was "The Drink With Quick Food Energy."

Vintage Pepsi Ad

During the energy-depleting days of World War II, the idea was that Pepsi's many, many calories would make the difference in manufacturing, ensuring that "American energy will win!"

Vintage Pepsi Ad

As the ad claims, soda was the way to get through a difficult wartime effort:

Vintage Pepsi Ad

So was this an anomaly? No. It was, at the very least, part of a Pepsi campaign that lasted through 1944 and part of a culture in which calories were often marketed as a positive (like ads for Hershey chocolate bars that bragged they were "more sustaining than meat"). True Diet Pepsi didn't show up until 1964.

That said, it didn't take long for the tide to change. Less than 10 years later, the February 15, 1953, issue of the New York Times has an ad that boasts a soda was "reduced in calories":

TimesMachine

The breakthrough product? Pepsi-Cola, no longer a "Quick Energy Food" but now "The Light Refreshment":

TimesMachine

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via