Netflix Beats Its Own Numbers, Adds 3.3 Million Subscribers, and Wall Street Cheers

A first look at Netflix Q2 earnings: The streaming video company generated revenue of $1.64 billion and earnings — after a 7-for-1 stock split — of six cents per share. Wall Street was looking for revenue of $1.65 billion and four cents per share.

More important are the company’s subscriber numbers: It added another 3.3 million subscribers — well above the 2.5 million it had projected last quarter. Netflix now has 63 million paid subscribers worldwide, and Wall Street is happy: Shares are up 10 percent in after-hours trading.

Netflix’s subscriber wins came both in the U.S. and in the rest of the world, where the company is really banking on new growth. It added 900,000 subscribers in the U.S. (it had projected 600,000) and 2.37 million internationally (it had projected 1.9 million).

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings says the company was surprised by its success. Not surprising: Hastings says that success came in part because people liked its new original shows, which Netflix says every quarter. Netflix has yet to acknowledge that any of its original programming has underperformed, and Hastings’ letter to shareholders is full of superlatives for shows like “Marvel’s Daredevil” this time around as well.

Fun nugget: Netflix says that three days after the new season of “Orange Is the New Black” debuted, the company streamed a record number of hours of video worldwide, even though it was competing with the season finale of HBO’s “Game of Thrones” and the NBA finals.

There’s not much else to chew on in Hastings’ letter, other than a pledge to be “available throughout the world” — which presumably means India and China — by the end of 2016. But Hastings and company are about to get on their earnings call, so if there’s stuff of note, I’ll update here or in a later post.

As always, here’s RBC analyst Mark Mahaney’s cheat sheet, so you can do your own armchair analysis (fun, right?):

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via