Jeb Bush is doing much, much worse than George W. was at this point in 1999

On the surface, Jeb Bush's presidential bid this cycle and his brother's in 2000 bear a strong resemblance. Each came at the end of the two-term presidency of a Democrat who succeeded someone named Bush. Each of started as a frontrunner with strong establishment support. Each vied to oppose a Democratic candidate who faced only token opposition in the primaries.

But the reality is that George W. Bush started off in a much, much stronger position in 2000 than Jeb Bush has this time. These two polls, juxtaposed by MSNBC's Steve Kornacki, make the point very clearly:

Jeb's rollout vs. W's: 5/31 CNN/ORC poll Rubio 14 Jeb 13 Walker/Huck 10 5/27/99 CNN/USA Today poll W 46 E Dole 18 Quayle 7 McCain 6

— Steve Kornacki (@SteveKornacki) June 4, 2015

At this point in 1999, W. was polling at more than triple Jeb's numbers. While Jeb is basically tied for first with Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, and Mike Huckabee, his brother was trouncing Elizabeth Dole, who withdrew just a few months later.

Of course, national polls are easy to overvalue, and they often reflect name recognition as much as anything else (Huckabee? really?). Iowa and New Hampshire polls are much more meaningful, and even those aren't necessarily a good indicator this early in the cycle.

But for what it's worth, they find the same thing. Bush is in fourth place in Iowa, according to RealClearPolitics' poll averages. Walker is way out in front with 18.2 percent, followed by Rubio with 11, Huckabee with 9.4, and Bush with 9.2, with Rand Paul (8.6), Ben Carson (8.4), and Ted Cruz (7.6) not far behind. In June 1999, by contrast, his brother was beating Dole 40 percent to 13 percent in a Des Moines Register poll, with Steve Forbes in third with 10. Bush is ahead in New Hampshire, but just barely: 14.7 percent versus 13 for Walker, 12.3 for Paul, and 11.3 for Rubio. In May 1999 a poll found his brother beating Elizabeth Dole and John McCain by 37 percent to 16 and 14, respectively.

George W. Bush was just much, much more strongly positioned at this point in the 2000 cycle than his brother is today. That doesn't mean that Bush can't win. But it does suggest we won't be able to coast to victory Dubya-style.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via