The House GOP is punishing rebellious members. Ted Cruz is steamed about it.

Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz ripped GOP leaders in Congress Wednesday for punishing conservatives who voted to kill President Barack Obama's trade agenda, escalating a fight the Texas senator wants to have with his party's establishment.

Following a series of votes on trade two Fridays ago, House Republican Whip Steve Scalise kicked three Republicans out of their spots on the party's vote-counting team, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) was stripped of a subcommittee chairmanship, and Red State's Erick Erickson reported Wednesday morning that Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) is in danger of losing his post as president of the freshman class.

The Meadows decision is a "shameful example" of a leader seeking retribution "because of his principled objections" to giving the president fast-track trade authority, Cruz said in a speech at the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Cruz, who is currently mired in the second tier of Republican presidential hopefuls, would need a big boost from conservative activists to make a real play for the nomination in 2016. That was his target audience in weaving the retribution anecdotes into a larger narrative pitting conservatives against what he calls the "Washington cartel" of politicians in both parties, lobbyists, and the mainstream media.

He has little to lose in going after Republican leaders, particularly in the House, because they already detest his brand of take-no-prisoners politics. They were incensed in late 2013 when his refusal to give up on repealing the Affordable Care Act paved the way for a government shutdown. And GOP leaders hate that Cruz often complicates their agenda by riling up House conservatives.

The relations have grown so frosty that John Boehner has taken to communicating with Cruz by gesture: The New York Times reported last month that the House speaker's response to a question about Cruz's campaign was to raise his middle finger.

Republican retribution

Meadows, Buck, and the three Republicans kicked off the whip team all voted against the GOP leadership on the rule for debating a package of trade bills — a serious no-no in a chamber that operates on majority-party rule. Voting against a rule is considered more disloyal than voting against a bill because it threatens the ability of party leaders to control which legislation comes to the floor.

The House and Senate eventually passed fast-track trade authority for Obama.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) the chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee and a Boehner ally, said he alone made the call to knock Meadows from the top spot on of one his panel's subcommittees.

Meadows said in a tweet that he won't vote with GOP leaders if he thinks it will harm his home district.

My voting card belongs to the people of Western North Carolina, & I will continue to listen to their voices regardless of the consequences.

— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) June 22, 2015

Boehner defended the Meadows move Wednesday after a GOP caucus meeting, according to the Hill.

"I think the chairman made the right decision. I made it clear to the members I supported that decision."

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via