Chris Rock considered succeeding Jon Stewart as Daily Show host — but only for a year

After Jon Stewart announced he was leaving The Daily Show, seemingly every famous comedian on the planet was discussed as a potential replacement. Though the little-known Trevor Noah ultimately got the job, it turns out the blue-sky dreams of having Chris Rock or Amy Poehler take over Comedy Central's flagship program were dreams the network shared, at least briefly.

In an excellent profile of Comedy Central's creative renaissance and struggles to navigate the new TV economy, Jonah Weiner writes for the New York Times Magazine that one of the two almost signed on.

Writes Weiner:

Comedy Central contemplated hiring several bigger stars. The network made a call to Amy Poehler, for instance, to gauge her interest. (As someone outside the company with knowledge of the exchange put it, "They were pretty much expecting her to say no, and it was the quickest no in history.") Chris Rock considered signing on, but not past Nov. 8, 2016: He wanted to cede the desk to a more permanent replacement after the next election. [Head of original programming Kent Alterman] acknowledged that Comedy Central had a lot of conversations with different people," but Noah, who had appeared several times on The Daily Show, was a favorite of Stewart's, and he won the network over. "Trevor's the only person we made an offer to," Alterman said.

The thought of a Chris Rock–hosted Daily Show, even if only for a year, seems almost too good to be true. That it apparently was a thing that very nearly happened only ignites the imagination further.

Stewart leaves The Daily Show on August 6, 2015. Noah's first show will air September 28, 2015.

Be sure to read Weiner's piece for so much more on Comedy Central's recent boom, including an account of how Charlie Sheen almost derailed Amy Schumer's currently skyrocketing career.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via