Why United is ending service to JFK

1. United Airlines is halting service to New York's JFK Airport.
2. Instead, transcontinental service to Los Angeles and San Francisco will be offered through the airline's hub at Newark Liberty International Airport.
3. Service to LA and San Francisco is also being upgraded with international-style amenities for non-coach travelers.
4. United's old slots at JFK will be taken over by Delta, which operates a hub at JFK.

United's move is all about consolidated operations

Consolidating operations at a single New York–area airport has a pretty compelling business logic. At Newark, United can offer connections to dozens of additional destinations, including smaller East Coast cities and major international centers.

At JFK, United was limited to offering point-to-point service. That placed them in head-to-head competition with smaller carriers like JetBlue as well as with Delta's much larger raft of potential JFK connections. By shifting to Newark, United can build on its existing strength.

Delta, by the same token, will benefit from the ability to add even more flights to its existing JFK hub.

Airlines are learning to compete less

Beyond efficiency considerations, however, the slot swap is also part of a trend whereby airlines are doing less direct competition with one another. This is probably necessary, since the airline industry was comically unprofitable for years, but rebuilding profitability by eliminating competition is a bad trend for consumers.

In this case, for example, part of what's happening is that even though Newark and JFK serve the same metropolitan area, they are still in different places. For residents of northern New Jersey, Newark Airport is much more convenient. Conversely, residents of Long Island find it much easier to get to JFK. By streamlining operations so that United's operations are consolidated in one airport and Delta's in another, both airlines gain a modicum of additional pricing power over suburbanites who have difficulty getting to an airport on the opposite side of New York City.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via