Free markets are more popular in Vietnam than in America

America might have lost the fight in Vietnam, but as this 2014 poll from Pew shows, capitalism won the war:

Pew Research Center

Note the actual question asked, which is the right one: are people better off in a free-market economy given the wide disparities in wealth that might result?

Vietnam's results are almost comically lopsided: 95 percent are for the free market, and only 3 percent are against it. They're so lopsided that it almost makes you question the data, though given the quality of Pew's work and its experience with international polling, I trust it. But even China's results slightly edge out the United States: only 18 percent of Chinese doubt the free market is better, while 25 percent of Americans do.

When you look deeper into Pew's numbers, China and Vietnam are outliers in another way, too: they have an almost unique combination of economic growth mixed with incredible optimism about the future. Residents of Vietnam, for instance, see a much brighter future for their children than residents of Nigeria, Peru, or India, despite the fact that all three countries have seen more growth in recent years than Vietnam:

Pew Research Center

Pew also asked about the best ways to solve inequality, and found that emerging economies were likelier to favor low taxes on the rich and on corporations than poorer nations:

Pluralities or majorities in 22 of the 44 countries surveyed say to reduce inequality it is more effective to have low taxes on the wealthy and corporations to encourage investment and economic growth rather than high taxes on the wealthy and corporations to fund programs that help the poor. Publics in 13 countries prefer the high tax option.

Overall, advanced economies (median of 48%) are somewhat more supportive than either developing (40%) or emerging (31%) countries of using high taxes on the wealthy and corporations to address income inequality.

(Poll via Conrad Hackett.)

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via