Intel's Standstill With Altera Expires in June; Hostile Bid Could Follow

Intel signed a standstill agreement earlier this year with Altera that expires on June 1, giving the world’s largest chip maker the option to launch a hostile bid after that, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The agreement, disclosed to Reuters by the sources this week, explains why Intel has refrained from launching a tender offer for Altera’s shares once their negotiations broke down. It also underscores the risk Altera faces of such a hostile bid.

Earlier this month, Altera rejected an unsolicited $54 per share offer from Intel following months of negotiations, the sources said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential information. They said Altera agreed to engage in these talks on the basis that Intel would not go public with any offer until June.

In February, Intel discussed offering $58 per share for Altera, based on publicly available information it reviewed at the time, according to the people. After signing a non-disclosure agreement and combing through non-public information, including the company’s outlook, it ended up revising down its offer, they said. Last week, Altera posted a sequential 9 percent decline in revenue for the first quarter and said it also expects weakness in its second-quarter guidance, particularly around its wireless business.

It is unclear whether Intel would take its proposal directly to shareholders, the sources said, but it remains an option available to it.

Intel and Altera both declined to comment.

The acquisition of Altera, which makes programmable chips widely used in cellphone towers and industrial applications and by the military, would underscore Intel Chief Executive Officer Brian Krzanich’s determination to expand into new markets as the personal computer industry loses steam.

TIG Advisors, an investment firm that holds shares in Altera, challenged a nomination to the company’s board of directors on Monday over Altera’s refusal to engage with Intel about a potential merger.

(Reporting by Nadia Damouni; Additional reporting by Liana Baker; Editing by Ted Botha)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via