Twitter's Latest Attempt at Content Misses the Mark

Twitter says it’s not a media company, but it’s creating media anyway — and it’s not going so great.

Twitter retired its Discover tab a few weeks back, replacing it with a more detailed trends section where trending topics now include a short, computer-generated description.

And over the weekend, one of those descriptions was rather unfortunate and completely inappropriate: “Ugly Feminists Freak Out Over #FeministsAreUgly Hashtag.” The #FeministsAreUgly trend first kicked off in the fall, and resurfaced this weekend as a way for women to dispel stereotypes about what feminism looks like.

Unfortunately, Twitter’s algorithm didn’t understand the context.

“The descriptions you see as part of the new Trends experience are mainly retrieved from popular, relevant articles shared on Twitter,” a company spokesperson explained to Re/code. “This is a new feature, and we are constantly tweaking the system to improve the quality of the descriptions.”

The blunder was an example of the challenges faced by all media companies, including Twitter (despite its claims to the contrary). Creating content is hard, even (perhaps especially) short descriptions, and if readers and advertisers are important to these companies (which they are), they’ll find themselves having to shape and direct the content running through the system. And you can’t rely on algorithms.

There’s little doubt that Twitter will improve — this is still a new feature, after all. But it’s vital that it does. Twitter wants to be the “global town square” for important conversations like this one, and users (and advertisers) will expect Twitter to provide a safe environment along the way.

https://twitter.com/rickyvanveen/status/592467847047213057/photo/1

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via