This shocking 1975 letter shows how far the federal government has come on gay rights

On Tuesday, the federal argument will argue to the US Supreme Court that states' same-sex marriage bans are unconstitutional. But 40 years ago, one agency within the federal government used a considerably different tone against marriage equality — using an anti-gay slur to tell a gay couple their marriage didn't exist.

Here is the 1975 letter from a district director at the Justice Department's Immigration and Naturalization Service, posted by BuzzFeed's Chris Geidner:

The letter — which states, "You have failed to establish that a bona fide marital relationship can exist between two faggots" — was in response to Richard Adams and Anthony Sullivan, one of the first gay couples in the nation to try to get their marriage recognized by the federal government. A renegade clerk in Colorado married the couple in 1975, and they tried to use the marriage so Sullivan, an Australian, could remain in the country. The Justice Department flatly rejected their request with the letter above.

The letter signals just how far support for gay rights has come over the past few decades. In 1977, Americans were evenly split — 43 percent to 43 percent — on whether consensual homosexual relationships should be legal, according to Gallup surveys. As of 2014, two-thirds of Americans say they should be legal — and it's hard to imagine a federal agency would get away with the language INS used in its response to Adams and Sullivan.

Watch: How marriage equality swept the country

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via