The Supreme Court’s oral arguments on King v. Burwell — the legal challenge that could dismantle Obamacare — were full of surprises. Sarah Kliff was there.
In moments like this — as people grapple to understand variants and vaccines, and kids head back to school — many outlets take their paywalls down. Vox’s content is always free, in part because of financial support from our readers. We’ve been covering the Covid-19 pandemic for more than a year and a half. From the beginning, our goal was to bring clarity to chaos. To empower people with the information they needed to stay safe. And we’re not stopping.
In the next 30 days, we’re aiming to add 2,500 individual contributions to help keep our coverage of the Covid-19 crisis free for everyone who needs it. As each of us is only as healthy as our sickest neighbor, it’s essential that people can access clear information on the pandemic for free. Will you help us reach our goal by making a contribution to Vox with as little as $3?
In This Stream
King v. Burwell: Obamacare subsidies upheld by Supreme Court
- Is the Supreme Court more liberal? Or are the cases more conservative?
- Obamacare's Supreme Court arguments, explained in 2 minutes
- The simplest explanation of the Obamacare court case, from Justice Elena Kagan
Next Up In Video
Sign up for the newsletter The Weeds
Understand how policy impacts people. Delivered Fridays.
