Video chat has been disappointing people for a century

In 1912, one inventor announced he had invented the early-20th-century equivalent of FaceTime — the Apple video-phone program that was supposed to change our lives. But just like Google Hangouts, Skype, and every other video-chat breakthrough, the hype outweighed the interest. Even a century ago, people realized video phones would be a little underwhelming.

Published in the March 8, 1912, edition of the Daybook, the concept was a mess of untested theory and pseudo-scientific jargon. According to inventor Jerome Meyer, the invention used "selenium ... so sensitive to electrical changes that the rays of light made varying degrees of shadow upon it." The super-sensitive selenium would conduct a video signal from one end of the device to the other. It also required X-rays, magnets, Roentgen ray generators, and 100,000 volts of power. It was impractical, but the idea wasn't completely absurd: Alexander Graham Bell proposed something similar in 1891.

Needless to say, none of us are using Meyer's device today — electronic signals gave us better options to transmit images. But the most notable revelation from the 1912 article about the "televisual phone" might be that people always thought a video phone would be a disappointment.

The headline shouted the big problem:

People kissing without the thrill. (The Daybook/Library of Congress)

And the video-phone takedown continues:

... the thrill will be missing. Aside from that intangible, but highly important feature, you'd never know the difference, for by Meyer's invention you hear the ecstatic sigh, see the love-light in your lady's eye and glimpse the blush that touches with crimson her creamy cheek.

Even with all that electricity and selenium, there was still something missing from Meyer's concept: a real connection (and, of course, a functioning machine). Today, when video phones actually work, that lack of connection might still be their biggest problem:

Closest thing I get to kissing my boyfriend for 10 more days is us both trying to sink an air kiss on a lagged FaceTime

— cokey (@Nicooole_xoxo) March 12, 2015

It's sad when your first instinct is to reach in and kiss your girlfriend through a FaceTime call. This time and distance is bullshit.

— Bwwwandon (@Bwwwandon) March 18, 2015

it's the cutest/saddest thing every night when me and christian get off FaceTime and say goodnight we blow each other a kiss

— ka (@kayleeholden) March 23, 2015

We're here to shed some clarity

One of our core beliefs here at Vox is that everyone needs and deserves access to the information that helps them understand the world, regardless of whether they can pay for a subscription. With the 2024 election on the horizon, more people are turning to us for clear and balanced explanations of the issues and policies at stake. We’re so grateful that we’re on track to hit 85,000 contributions to the Vox Contributions program before the end of the year, which in turn helps us keep this work free. We need to add 2,500 contributions this month to hit that goal. Will you make a contribution today to help us hit this goal and support our policy coverage? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via