Did an artist put Monica's dress in the National Portrait Gallery's Bill Clinton painting?

The painting of former President Bill Clinton in Washington DC's National Portrait Gallery contains a visual reference to Monica Lewinsky's blue dress, artist Nelson Shanks disclosed in a new interview with Stephanie Farr of the Philadelphia Daily News.

Shanks said that painting Clinton was a challenge because he thinks Clinton is "probably the most famous liar of all time." Shanks acknowledged that "he and his administration did some very good things," but said, "I could never get the Monica thing completely out of my mind and it is subtly incorporated in the painting." He went on:

"If you look at the left-hand side of it there's a mantle in the Oval Office and I put a shadow coming into the painting and it does two things. It actually literally represents a shadow from a blue dress that I had on a mannequin, that I had there while I was painting it, but not when he was there. It is also a bit of a metaphor in that it represents a shadow on the office he held, or on him."

Indeed you can see the incongruous shadow, which distinctly seems to have the arm of a dress, in the painting here:

Shanks also told Parr that "the Clintons hate the portrait" and "want it removed" from the Gallery (which is part of the Smithsonian Institution), though the Gallery denied that to Parr. Clinton's team hasn't yet commented on the matter. Read more from the Philadelphia Daily News here.

WATCH: 'The myth of the "supermale" and extra Y chromosome'

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via