Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinks the country is ready for gay marriage. That matters.

1. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told Bloomberg that it would "not take a large adjustment" for the country to accept a constitutional right to gay marriage.
2. In January, the Supreme Court agreed to hear same-sex marriage cases from four states, setting up a decision by the end of June.
3. Ginsburg's statement is consequential. One worry the justices could have ruling for gay marriage is that the ruling could lead to a terrible backlash against the Court. She's saying that she, at least, doesn't believe that would happen.

"The rest of us recognized they are one of us"

As the Supreme Court prepares to rule on marriage equality, Ginsburg addressed a key stumbling block in her interview with Bloomberg: public readiness.

While it's easy to imagine the Court exists in a realm of pure law and cares nothing for public opinion, the evidence is quite the opposite: the Court takes public opinion into account, whether consciously or unconsciously, in its rulings. And so if the justices believed that the country would revolt against a ruling that legalized gay marriage, that ruling would become that much less likely.

But in her comments to Bloomberg, Ginsburg dismissed that fear. "The change in people's attitudes on that issue has been enormous," she said. "In recent years, people have said, ‘This is the way I am.' And others looked around, and we discovered it's our next-door neighbor — we're very fond of them. Or it's our child's best friend, or even our child. I think that as more and more people came out and said that ‘this is who I am,' the rest of us recognized that they are one of us."

Ginsburg, at least, thinks the public is ready to accept the Supreme Court finding a constitutional right to gay marriage. The question is whether four other justices agree with her.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via