Vox Sentences: The Supreme Court affirmative-action case that just won’t die

SCOTUS conservatives go negative on affirmative action; India and Pakistan slightly reduce odds of the world blowing itself up; who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

Vox Sentences is written by Dylan Matthews and Dara Lind.

TOP NEWS

The Seven Years' Supreme Court Case

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

• The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Fisher v. University of Texas, a case about whether it's appropriate for officials at public colleges and universities to consider race in the admissions process.

  [Vox / Libby Nelson]

• This is the second time the Court's heard the case in three years. In 2013, they sent it back to the circuit court for more clarity about how, exactly, UT uses race in its admissions process.

  [Los Angeles Times / David G. Savage]

• UT argues that it's important to generate diversity for its own sake. Court conservatives were unconvinced; Chief Justice Roberts asked how a nonwhite student would improve a physics class.

  [Chicago Tribune]

• Justice Scalia, meanwhile, argued that minority students suffer when they get into more selective schools than they otherwise would — a theory called "mismatch" that is not supported by the academic literature.

  [Brookings / Matthew M. Chingos]

• At this point, the case is purely about precedent. The student in question, Abby Fisher, has graduated from another school. And there's evidence she wouldn't have gotten into UT even if she weren't white.

  [ProPublica / Nikole Hannah-Jones]

Death of the "pink flamingo"?

Justin Tallis - WPA Pool/Getty Images

• India and Pakistan are resuming their on-again, off-again bilateral talks — in the hopes of defusing tensions over Kashmir and over Pakistan's role in terrorism in India.

  [The Hindu / Suhasini Haidar and Kallol Bhattacharjee]

• Pakistan would rather discuss Kashmir; India wants to talk terrorism. So, like previous versions of the talks, they'll be discussing both at once in separate working groups.

  [Wall Street Journal / Saeed Shah and Qasim Nauman]

• The talks were broken off in 2008 after the Mumbai terror attacks, restarted in 2011, then broken off again in 2013 after the killing of some Indian soldiers by Pakistani special forces.

  [LiveMint / Elizabeth Roche]

• In a gesture of goodwill, Pakistan has promised an "early conclusion" to its trials of the Mumbai attack suspects as part of the groundwork for the new talks.

  [The Guardian / Jon Boone]

• The India/Pakistan dispute is a big deal globally because both participants have nuclear weapons. Some analysts call the prospect of Indian/Pakistani nuclear war a "pink flamingo" — a horrible possibility that's hiding in plain sight but ignored.

  [War on the Rocks / David Barno and Nora Bensahel]

• According to a vocal minority of scholars, however, the fact that both countries have nukes actually deters them from attacking each other.

  [Vox / Dylan Matthews and Sumit Ganguly]

Satoshi Nakamoto is in all of us

Antana

• The virtual currency Bitcoin was invented by a mysterious human or collecrtion of humans using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. This week — not for the first time — the media claimed it had figured out who Nakamoto is.

  [Vox / Timothy B. Lee]

• Both Gizmodo and Wired ran articles yesterday claiming — based on what looked like pretty extensive evidence dating back to 2009 — that Satoshi Nakamoto is an Australian man named Craig Steven Wright.

  [Gizmodo / Sam Biddle and Andy Cush]

• Wired's article (and subsequent reporting), however, made it clear that some of the evidence had been altered after 2013 — in other words, Wright wanted to make it look like he was Nakamoto. Other evidence has been technologically debunked.

  [Motherboard / Sarah Jeong]

• Thickening the plot, the Australian federal police raided Wright's home and office for a tax investigation. They claimed it wasn't about the news stories, but that doesn't mean it wasn't about Bitcoin — there's been a long dispute in Australia over the tax status of the currency.

  [Reuters / Byron Kaye and Colin Packham]

• It looks like would-be sleuths will have to go back to the drawing board — or check out existing possibilities. This list, for example, includes 9 other people (and one US National Security Agency) who might be Satoshi Nakamoto.

  [CryptoConisNews / Justin O'Connell]

• This isn't just a game, though. Nakamoto's unmasking — and what the real Nakamoto does next — could have big implications for the value of bitcoin, which has fluctuated drastically over the last few years.

  [Reuters / Jeremy Wagstaff]

MISCELLANEOUS

The US prison population, broken down in one big, comprehensive pie chart. [Prison Policy Institute / Peter Wagner]

• Futurists have been predicting the future of food for centuries. The predictions don't really hold up. (See also: Dippin' Dots, the "ice cream of the future," est. 1987)

  [NPR / Benjamin Aldes Wurgaft]

• The amusing, and horrifying, possibillities that gene-editing tool CRISPR holds for custom-made pets.

  [Motherboard / Jason Koebler]

• The drug-information clearinghouse Erowid is run by a California couple who sound so charming I (Dara) would like to crash with them for a long weekend.

  [New Yorker / Emily Witt]

• Marco Rubio successfully got an obscure but important Obamacare provision repealed last year. Why isn't that a bigger story?

  [Washington Post / David Weigel]

VERBATIM

"Reports of a person’s dying in a gang-related shooting come freighted with the implication that the victim didn’t get killed, but got himself killed. It can amount to victim-blaming. It’s a dehumanizing designation, based on the predominant image of gang members as marauding, gun-toting savages." [NYT / Jason Harrington]

• "Do you know how many guests at amusement parks drown per year from sentient forcep killings? No, we don’t either. Those statistics often go unreported."

  [Entertainment Weekly / Marc Snetiker]

• "RZA emailed a statement to Bloomberg claiming Shkreli purchased the album before anyone knew he was a terrible human, and that the group donated 'a significant portion' of the album's proceeds to charity."

  [The Verge / Lizzie Plaugic]

• "Once a month, on the first night of the new moon, the Beast comes to Parliament House and chooses one employee of the Australian government to drag back to its lair … Now that I stop to think about it, I don’t know why we don’t just work from home on the first night of the new moon."

  [Hottest Heads of State]

• "Every time I play The Sims, I start my family with a painting goblin. I make him/her morbidly obese with green skin. I make sure to give him the following traits: likes to be alone, likes art, hates the outdoors. The first thing I do, once I have enough money, is build a small room in the basement, send him down there, and then remove the stairs … Eventually his paintings become very good and worth a lot of money. Every few minutes I go downstairs and sell whatever painting he has finished, and then I return to playing the game. My family always ends up feeling blessed because of their fortune, and they never find out about the horrible secret living beneath their home."

  [Bill Goats via Telegraph / Rhiannon Williams]

WATCH THIS

Learn these 8 Scrabble words to supercharge your game [YouTube / Phil Edwards and Carlos Waters]

Vox / Carlos Waters

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via