Twitter changed stars to hearts, and Twitter users went nuts

For years, if you liked a tweet you could click a little star icon to "favorite" it. But Twitter has decided that this concept is too confusing, so it's rebranding it as a "like" button (that sounds familiar) and replacing the star with a heart:

You can say a lot with a heart. Introducing a new way to show how you feel on Twitter: https://t.co/WKBEmORXNW pic.twitter.com/G4ZGe0rDTP

— Twitter (@twitter) November 3, 2015

This is part of a larger campaign by Twitter to expand the appeal of its social network. Twitter is extremely popular among journalists and the tech elite, but it has fallen far behind Facebook among ordinary users. Twitter has about 320 million users, compared with 1.5 billion Facebook users. That's upsetting to Wall Street, which wants to see Twitter earn Facebook-like profits instead of the losses it's been suffering quarter after quarter.

Twitter has been trying a variety of things to make itself more accessible, including a "moments" tab that displays curated collections of tweets about news stories and a "while you were away" feature that shows occasional users the most interesting tweets that appeared since they last logged in.

Unsurprisingly, lots of people on Twitter had opinions, and made jokes, about the change:

Pretty happy everyone else on Twitter is talking about the star wars as well

— David Zhou (@dz) November 3, 2015

I've learned 3 things from Twitter: 1) People hate change. 2) People accept change. 3) We'll all be dead in 100 years and no one will care.

— Matt Novak (@paleofuture) November 3, 2015

Personally, I think we should have the option of using *all* of the Lucky Charms.

— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 3, 2015

ironically, twitter didn’t use its OWN NEW FEATURE — polls — to learn that no one wants hearts

— Chris Ziegler (@zpower) November 3, 2015

Retweets to be renamed pokes

— James Cook (@JamesLiamCook) November 3, 2015

what's ❤️ got 2 do, got 2 do w/ it what's ❤️ but a 2️⃣✋emotion what's ❤️ got 2 do, got 2 do w/it who needs a ❤️ when a ⭐️ can't be broken⁉️

— SarahNicolePrickett (@snpsnpsnp) November 3, 2015

This is your daily reminder that there are other things happening in the world, and people who don't use Twitter exist!

— Lauren Katz (@Laur_Katz) November 3, 2015

.@Twitter we’re glad you had a change of heart. We like you even more!

— American Heart Assoc (@American_Heart) November 3, 2015

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via