Police Chiefs and Prosecutors Call on Lawmakers to Address 'Critical Threat' of Encryption

New voices within the law enforcement community called on legislators to address what they describe as the “critical threat” that encrypted private communications pose to public safety.

Organizations representing police chiefs and the nation’s prosecutors Tuesday urged lawmakers to take immediate action to bolster their ability to fight crime and combat terrorism. They say that advances in secure communication have erected “insurmountable” barriers to gathering electronic evidence of wrongdoing.

“The inability of law enforcement to overcome these barriers, known as ‘Going Dark’ in the law enforcement community, has already led to numerous instances where investigators were unable to access information that could have allowed them to successfully investigate and apprehend criminals or prevent terrorists from striking,” the groups said in a joint statement.

The Nov. 13 terrorist attacks in Paris have renewed the public debate about encryption. That puts pressure on companies such as Apple, Google parent Alphabet and Facebook, which began to offer consumers secure communications tools after documents leaked by former NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed the breadth of the U.S. government’s surveillance program.

For the moment, there is no evidence to suggest terrorists used encryption to organize the Paris attacks, though Islamic State militants used one of the free, easily available encrypted apps, Telegram, to claim responsibility for the bombing of a Russian jet.

Still, federal law enforcement agencies have used the attacks to renew calls for keys to unlock private communications in the interest of safety. Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush came out against encryption even before the attacks, though Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul has said he will ensure Americans can protect their data if he’s elected president.

Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton tried to strike a middle ground, calling on technology companies to work with Washington, D.C. “We need Silicon Valley not to view government as its adversary,” she said in a speech at the Center on Foreign Relations in New York City.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via