Donald Trump Is Target of Marc Andreessen's Latest Twitter Takedowns

Anyone who follows the Sage of Sand Hill Road on Twitter is accustomed to Marc Andreessen’s 140-character monologues on Silicon Valley’s economy — often ridiculing those who think the tech sector is in the midst of another investing bubble.

But lately, another obsession has taken hold: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Andreessen can’t seem to fathom how the billionaire real estate mogul who says such provocative — and, some would say, offensive — things remains the GOP front-runner, months before the New Hampshire primary in February.

Consider Friday’s installment, in which Andreessen talks about Trump’s grandfather, Friedrich, who emigrated from Germany to the U.S. at the age of 16 to chase the American dream. For granddad, opportunity took the form of leasing a restaurant in Seattle’s red-light district and providing food, booze and “private rooms for ladies” (code for prostitutes), Politico reports.

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/667843383570751488

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/667840971971817472

When Trump talked about creating a mandatory database of Muslims in the United States in the aftermath of the Paris bombings, Andreessen amplified the voices of critics by retweeting comments to his 440,000 followers.

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/668605977982164992

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/667929672630403072

Andreessen recognizes that Twitter provides a pulpit to share his views. In an interview with The New Yorker, he described how the platform was the surest way to get reporters’ attention.

Andreessen says that he loves Twitter because “reporters are obsessed with it. It’s like a tube and I have loudspeakers installed in every reporting cubicle around the world.” He believes that if you say it often enough and insistently enough it will come — a glorious revenge. He told me, “We have this theory of nerd nation, of forty or fifty million people all over the world who believe that other nerds have more in common with them than the people in their own country. So you get to choose what tribe or band or group you’re a part of.” The nation-states of Twitter will map the world.

This time, Andreessen appears to be aiming for the beltway crowd, not the scribes in Silicon Valley. Or maybe he’s just hoping to reach anyone who’s willing to listen.

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/666837681259712512

Andreessen doesn’t appear to be using the old-fashioned approach for capturing the ear of politicians, via campaign donations.

Federal Election Commission records indicate the influential venture capital investor has yet to back a candidate in the 2016 presidential race (he was a major supporter of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in 2012, donating $100,000 to the “Restore Our Future” super PAC created by former aides to the Massachusetts governor).

Andreessen seems to suggest he’d even consider backing Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, if Trump emerges as the Republican party’s standard-bearer in 2016. He didn’t respond to a direct message asking if he was serious — or lampooning Clinton, who has also been the focus of his Twitter ruminations.

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/667436808557477888

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via