Nightmare Robot Cat Has Come for Your Grandma

Do you know an elderly shut-in who desperately craves companionship and company? Great news! An incredibly terrifying facsimile of a real animal, one that meows, rolls over and “vibra-purrs,” can now be yours for only $99.

In a marketing ploy that seems as ill-conceived as the product it’s hawking, Hasbro touts its “Joy for All Companion Pets” as “designed to bring comfort, companionship and fun for your elder loved ones.” Which cannot be true, because your average 80-year-old has eyes and can therefore see that these are robot cats.

The robo-cat’s fur is supposed to be lifelike and soft to the touch. It has specific interactive capabilities — for instance, if you stroke its face, it nuzzles back against you. And if you pet it for a longer time, its eyes will close and it will fall “asleep.”

Remember, folks. Don Draper would be 80 today — if he were real, unlike these cats. What do you think Don Draper would do if you gave him a faux-fur Joy for All Companion Pet?

To be fair, there is evidence that pet-companion therapy is extremely beneficial to the elderly. And that when that’s not practical, plush toys are, indeed, a great comfort to people with dementia. And there are many lists like this of things to do with seniors to keep them engaged with people and the world around them: No. 20 is “Have a friend visit with a well-behaved pet.”

But robot kitties? Even research on robo-cats didn’t find a significant difference between non-robotic plush cats and plush cats animated by the soul of Satan.

Hasbro

Oddly, this isn’t the first iteration of scary-creepy plush creatures unleashed upon the elderly. A $6,000 white-seal version called “Paro,” as in “I’m paro-noid that this creature will eat my face if I fall asleep,” has been available since about 2004.

The problem here, really, is that these robo-cats fall firmly into the uncanny valley, that area of perception in which something that’s almost real becomes frightening because your brain knows there’s something off, but can’t tell exactly what. It’s a big problem in robotics.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via