Facebook or Google? Singular's Dashboard Shows Mobile App Ad Bang for Buck.

Mobile ads can be a gold mine (see Facebook). They can also be a land mine. The ads are much harder to track than those on the desktop, and the companies that crack the problem, like Facebook, can suddenly suck all the business away (see Millennial Media).

Singular, an analytics startup launched by execs who sold their other analytics startup to Facebook, says it has a solution for the measurement problem. Today it’s putting out a new dashboard for advertisers to track the dollars they spend on mobile and make from mobile apps across more than 250 channels, including Facebook, Google and Twitter. In theory, the dashboard could show when smaller channels perform better. But it’s likely to reinforce the status quo on mobile: That promoting your app on Facebook is growing more expensive, yet usually worthwhile.

Advertisers can do this now, yet they have to go to each platform individually. Google doesn’t show you how well your apps do on Facebook, for example. Singular hopes to be the “Switzerland of mobile marketing,” said co-founder Susan Kuo. She and the other two founders came from Onavo, a mobile app intelligence company that Facebook scooped up in 2013.

Their platform, which can compare how apps perform on Android and iOS, offers an apples-to-apples comparison of spending, said James Peng, head of apps strategy for Match.com, a big app promoter. “It’s extremely difficult to do that without building your own tools,” he added. So he buys Singular’s.

Here’s a sampling of what it looks like. (It’s real data based on Singular’s clients, but not from a single one; click for a larger version.)

Singular

This will vary for each app, but it’s a good snapshot of the trends. As you can see, Google drives a ton more installs and is considerably cheaper than Facebook (the $3.68 per install is on the low end, from what I’ve heard). Vungle, a company that runs video ads inside apps, drives more installs than Facebook but delivers far less in return-on-investment.

EMarketer estimates that ad spending on mobile devices will reach around $15 billion this year, surpassing the spending on desktop for the first time. Facebook rakes in the most, followed by Google, then Twitter and a long, rough tail.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via