Twitter's Board Doesn't Tweet -- And That Doesn't Matter

On Wednesday, Twitter appointed as executive chairman longtime Googler Omid Kordestani, a Silicon Valley veteran who checks nearly all the boxes you’d want in a new board leader.

He’s well respected in the industry. He knows how to grow a business — more specifically, he knows how to grow an ad business. And he has deep connections with the kind of tech and media companies Twitter is looking to collaborate with.

But Kordestani does have one “flaw” — a very Twitter-specific “flaw,” in fact: He doesn’t tweet. Like, at all.

Before Wednesday’s announcement, Kordestani had tweeted just nine times since joining the service nearly five years ago. For reference, Twitter co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey has tweeted nearly 17,500 times. Accentuating Kordestani’s tweet history is the fact that other board members like Marjorie Scardino (10 tweets) and Peter Currie (117 tweets) are also pretty silent.

The trio are reflective of Twitter’s greater struggle — that it’s having a tough time convincing people to use the product. That’s evident given that three people who are supposed to care deeply about the company still rarely post. Would Apple bring on a board member who doesn’t use an iPhone? Or would Uber hire a staunch cab patron to help advise its business? No, probably not.

But here’s the counterargument: None of that matters with Twitter.

In many ways, Kordestani, Scardino and Currie are exactly the kind of people Twitter is trying to reach. The company has argued for a year that much of its value resides in people who aren’t actually tweeting, but rather consuming. Ever since it showed off this chart of eccentric circles to investors last November (you remember the circles, right??), it has been trying to convince Wall Street that Twitter is about reach.

It already has every big-name publisher on the planet creating content on Twitter for free; the challenge is making sure people can actually find it. That’s why it built and recently launched Moments, its latest attempt to reach people who may not have an account but still want to enjoy the conversations that take place on Twitter.

So who cares if Kordestani isn’t a Twitter power user? It’s clear that that group of users isn’t the future anyway, at least not for Twitter. Instead, Twitter needs to reach people who don’t have an interest in tweeting. Luckily for them, they have a board full of these people to give them ideas on how to do that.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via