Mike Huckabee: "Pimp" Jay-Z is exploiting Beyonce as a "sex object"

Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and 2008 Republican presidential hopeful who's considering a second run in 2016, has found another way to differentiate himself from President Obama: attacking Jay-Z and Beyoncé.

Huckabee is set to release a book titled God, Guns, Grits and Gravy on January 20, presumably as a move in the invisible primary. According to early excerpts obtained by U.S. News and World Report, Huckabee has some hot opinions about hip-hop's leading couple.

In the book, Huckabee talks about Beyoncé and Jay-Z's performance of "Drunk In Love" at the 2014 Grammy Awards where the two danced around a chair in a cloud of smoke and talent:

"My reaction: Why?" he writes. "Beyoncé is incredibly talented — gifted, in fact. She has an exceptional set of pipes and can actually sing. She is a terrific dancer — without the explicit moves best left for the privacy of her bedroom. Jay-Z is a very shrewd businessman, but I wonder: Does it occur to him that he is arguably crossing the line from husband to pimp by exploiting his wife as a sex object?"

Here's the performance:

Huckabee is right about Beyoncé being talented, but he gets into several levels of muddy sexism with where he goes next. First, Beyoncé's "explicit moves" are mostly done on her own on a chair, and fully fit the themes of the song. Second, any idea that Beyoncé herself is not a shrewd businessman is completely misguided. The woman dropped an album in the middle of the night and no one knew. They are at least equally good business people, and Beyoncé is her own person. If she wants to dance on stage sexily, she will. The idea that Jay-Z controls her decisions is absolutely absurd.

Huckabee's inclusion of the word "arguably" is a smart one. Because outright calling Jay-Z, a rapper, father, and husband, a pimp is actually insane.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via