One chart showing just how poorly women are represented in this year's Oscar nominees

If you have paid any attention to this year's Oscar nominees, you know that a glaring lack of diversity is sharing the spotlight with all of this year's stars. Selma director Ava DuVernay, who would have been the first black woman nominated for best director, was snubbed in that category. And the all-white slate of acting nominees spawned its own hashtag, #OscarsSoWhite.

In a post on Ello, Squarely Rooted focuses on gender diversity and finds that this is the first year since 2004 that none of the best picture nominees have featured a woman protagonist.

(Ello)

And even then, 2004 may have been more woman-friendly than this year. Squarely Rooted counts "Million Dollar Baby" as focusing on a man alone (Clint Eastwood's grizzled boxing coach), but you could easily make the case that Hillary Swank shared the spotlight with him. In that case, the last man-centric year was 1999.

Which makes this year's best picture sausagefest all the more depressing, as there are now 10 opportunities, not the former five, for a film focusing on a woman to make it into the top.

And it really highlights that even today, telling men's stories is simply the norm. Women may make up half the population, but the stories the (old-white-men-packed) Academy celebrates overwhelmingly center around men — and usually white men, at that.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via