400,000 immigrants are waiting years for a court hearing

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University keeps tabs on the country's immigration courts — where immigrants go to determine whether they should get legal status, or be deported. As of July 2014, they found, nearly 400,000 immigrants are waiting for their cases to be resolved — a record high, and an increase of over 20 percent in a little under two years.

The average immigrant with a pending case, according to TRAC's data, has been waiting for 567 days — a little over a year and a half.

Here's how it breaks down around the country, based on regional immigration court data. (Kansas is split between the Missouri and Illinois regional courts.):

Immigration courts around the country have been facing a serious backlog for years: more money is poured into federal immigration enforcement, which means more immigrants are coming into the court system, but the courts themselves aren't getting the same increases in funding to hire more judges and staff.

As the number of migrant children and families coming to the US from Central America continued to rise through this spring, it sparked a crisis that threatened to overwhelm the immigration court system — which could barely deal with the immigrants it already had. One of the ways the federal government responded to the crisis was to send a resource "surge" of immigration judges and court officials to Texas, where most of the migrants were entering the US.

The immigration courts with the biggest caseloads are the ones with the biggest immigrant populations — states like Texas, California, New York, and New Jersey. But they appear to have more judges a pair of heartland states who have smaller caseloads but longer waits: Nebraska (and Iowa), and Ohio. But no matter where an immigrant lives in the US — with the exception of Hawaii — her local immigration court isn't going to have the resources to quickly resolve her case.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via