Making it cheaper and easier to trade stocks is a terrible idea

Sometimes you read about a startup idea that sounds too ridiculous to possibly be a business. Other times you read about a startup idea that's chillingly plausible. Robin Hood which wants to offer zero-commission smartphone-based stock trading, falls into the latter category: it makes perfect sense as a business, but it will be a disaster for customers if they use it.

The deal with commissions is this. Traditional stock brokers exacted hefty transaction fees from consumers every time they made a trade. Then online brokerages like E-Trade entered the scene with a disruptive business model that offered drastically lower fees. Robin Hood is aiming to take the process the next logical step forward — zero consumer-facing fees will let it sign up a massive user base and generate revenues through other means. What exactly those means will be is a bit uncertain at this point, but where there's a massive user base, there's a way.

Unfortunately, this is a product that nobody should use.

>

That's because the problem with buying and selling shares of stock has very little to do with brokerage fees. The problem is that you are not very good at picking which stocks to buy and sell. You do not have the level of investment skill necessary to beat the accumulated research departments and trading algorithms of all the time investment banks and hedge funds. And if you did have that level of skill, you wouldn't be trading from your smartphone — you'd be plying your trade as a full-time job. But human beings have a tendency toward overconfidence and overtrading and those overconfident overtraders are the market for this app.

Just remember that on average the stock market is more likely than not to go up, so if you manage to save for the long run by buying a diverse portfolio of stocks you'll come out ahead. But trying to pick stocks and trade rapidly is a bad idea, so a new platform that makes it cheaper and easier to do is by no means good news.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via