Stock art models are likely all pregnant because they are very bad at birth control

I write a lot about reproductive health care here at Vox. Every now and then, I need to find photographs of birth control for these articles. So I turn to stock art site called Shutterstock that Vox subscribes to — and time and time again, I find photographs that definitely do not illustrate how birth control works.

Let's start with birth control pills. There's this photograph of a woman storing birth control in her underpants. This is weird, because it's pretty easy to learn on the internet that birth control pills are taken orally.

This is wrong. (Shutterstock)

But it turns out, this happens a lot among stock photography models. Sometimes they wear different-colored underpants to store their birth control.

Still wrong. (Shutterstock)

The practice appears to be widespread. Women of different races store birth control in their underpants.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. (Shutterstock)

Sometimes women use leggings to hold their birth control in place, fashionably paired with a belt and a pair of jorts.

So wrong, and not just the jorts. (Shutterstock)

Most women stand up when they do this. But some, understandably, get tired and lie down. It is a lot of work carrying birth control in your underpants.

Even when you lie down, STILL WRONG. (Shutterstock)

Women also appear to do this with racier underwear that is a bit too NSFW to post on a family-friendly site like Vox, but which you can view on the Shutterstock site.

One other method of birth control use that appears to be popular among stock photography models is holding a packet of birth control to their stomach.

Nope. (Shutterstock)

It happens a lot, apparently, albeit with different hand placements.

Still nope. (Shutterstock)

This, again, will not work: birth control pills must be taken orally (and, ideally, at the same time each day) to be effective in preventing pregnancy.

Now, to be fair, it's not just stock art women who are bad at understanding birth control. When you move over to condoms, stock art men are equally clueless. Seriously, what is this guy doing?

This might work as birth control, but not in the way this gentleman thinks. (Shutterstock)

I would hope it's decently widespread knowledge that condoms do not go on one's eye in the style of the Monopoly man. They should go on the penis, as a barrier to prevent pregnancy and disease during sex.

This message, however, does not appear to have permeated in Stock-art-landia. There are tons of guys, like this one, who put condoms on their fingers.

Put that thumb down, sir. (Shutterstock)

I guess that is just slightly better than putting a condom on a banana — something that happens a lot in the world of stock art.

Nope. (Shutterstock)

Last, we come to the two most bizarre forms of birth control that show up on Shutterstock. One is an IUD inserted into a flower.

(Shutterstock)

IUDs are a fantastic contraceptive! They have a very low failure rate — but that's only true when they are inserted into a uterus, not a flower.

The other is a sperm wrapped in tinfoil, resulting in something that one of my colleagues described as a "pavé sperm."

DEFINITELY nope. (Shutterstock)

This will not work either, and, quite honestly, the logistics of wrapping a sperm in tinfoil seem a bit mind-boggling to begin with.

Stock art turns out to be a relatively terrible way to learn about preventing pregnancy. If you are looking for better resources, I would suggest checking out seven facts that anyone taking birth control pills should know. There is also Planned Parenthood's site on birth control (as well as the organization's Tumblr). Last, Princeton University also runs an excellent site specific to emergency contraceptives.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via