The Smosh Guys Want to Go From YouTube to the Movie Theater

Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox are already a very big deal on YouTube. How big can they be in Hollywood?

We are going to find out: Lionsgate, the studio behind movie franchises like the “The Hunger Games” and “The Expendables,” has picked up the rights to “The Smosh Movie,” the film the Web comedy duo produced earlier this year.

Padilla and Hecox aren’t the first Web video stars to try their hands at a movie — you may or may not recall “The Fred Movie,” starring Lucas “Fred” Cruikshank, which ended up going to Nickelodeon instead of theaters — but they are probably the biggest. Their YouTube channels have 30 million subscribers, and their standalone site generates 12 million visitors a month.

A press release describes the movie as a “high-concept ‘Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure’ for 2014,” and I’m not really sure what that means. But that may beside the point, since Smosh fans likely won’t care what it means, either. And like many popular YouTube videos, this one will also feature other people who are popular on YouTube, including Jenna Marbles, Grace Helbig and Shane Dawson.

Lionsgate hasn’t publicly committed to releasing this one in theaters, but that’s the plan, says Keith Richman, president of Defy Media, the Web conglomerate that owns the Smosh brand. Lionsgate also owns a chunk of Defy, but Richman says the deal was done at arm’s length.

Also of note: The film was produced and co-financed by AwesomenessTV, the YouTube network acquired by DreamWorks Animation last year. And Awesomeness head Brian Robbins got into YouTube-land after producing “The Fred Movie” in 2010.

Last spring we interviewed Padilla and Hecox at our Code/Media event in Santa Monica, and they insisted that they wanted to keep their focus on their Web empire, and would only dabble in movies or TV. If the movie works, it will be interesting to revisit that question.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via