The History of Failed Smartwatches, Buttered Coffee and More Morning #Mustreads

Good morning!

Here’s the best stuff on the Web, served to you on a silver platter by the Re/code team:

1. Apple is famous for letting other people take a crack at a new product before showing up with its own version. So here are many unsuccessful predecessors to Apple Watch, via GOOD Magazine. If you think $349 is a little pricey for Tim Cook’s new offering, check out the Pulsar Time Computer Calculator, which cost $2,100 in 1975.
2. There are some deeply misguided people who apparently are putting butter in their coffee, because some corners of the Internet have suggested it makes you feel more awake. Some poor soul at Slate actually tried coffee with butter to see if it makes a difference and, surprise, not really.
3. Nate Jackson, an ex-NFL tight end, penned a New York Times op-ed calling out the NFL’s banned substances abuse policy, specifically regarding marijuana. Useful tidbit: “In my playing days, the marijuana smokers struck me as sharper, more thoughtful and more likely to challenge authority than the nonsmokers.”
4. In a tidy, thoughtful post at Vulture, Lindsay Weber argues that U2’s album-giveaway announcement onstage with Apple yesterday was a major dud for the band. Gone are the days when releasing a special-edition iPod with one of the world’s biggest rock groups solidified a tech company’s “cool.” Instead, we now live in a time where the world’s biggest rock groups feel the need to partner with those same tech companies in an effort to remain cool.
5. Between 1941 and 1958, 12 buildings designed by Frank Lloyd Wright were constructed on Florida Southern College’s campus in Lakeland, Florida. They’re an eclectic and historically significant group of buildings, featuring Wright’s signature use of glass in unexpected spaces. Seventy years later, the blocks supporting the signature building of the group are failing, and modern 3-D printing technology is what’s being used to save it. Fast Company has the story.

If you see any stories you’d like to send our way (or have any questions/comments about stories we’ve recommended), feel free to shoot an email to noah.kulwin@recode.net.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via